Your input is needed on a review comparing the outcomes of using embryos at earlier versus later stages in development in IVF
Skills / interests: Consumer (public, patient, carer) input
Would you be interested in helping us with this article focused on the outcomes of using embryos at earlier versus later stages in development, for patients undergoing IVF.
I am looking for a consumer who would be willing to peer review this Cochrane systematic review “Cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology”
Cochrane considers a consumer to be a person with experience of the condition (in this case, undergoing assisted reproduction), either as a patient or as a carer/family member of a patient. From a consumer perspective, we are interested if the language of the review, especially the language used in the Plain Language Summary, is accessible and if it feels relevant for those experiencing, such that it will be helpful to patients and carers with healthcare decision making.
While you are welcome to provide feedback on any aspect of the review, you can focus your attention on the summary sections. Our aim is for this to be a manageable task, that does not overburden consumer reviewers.
Thank you in advance for considering!