Have you or someone you know experienced or been affected by bladder cancer (urothelial carcinoma)? Your input is needed on a review considering extended versus standard lymph node dissection during radical cystectomy for people with bladder cancer.
Skills / interests: Patient and public input
Would you be interested in helping us with this research article focused on extended versus standard lymph node dissection for people with bladder cancer?
I am looking for a patient or member of the public who would be willing to peer review this Cochrane systematic review, “Extended versus standard lymph node dissection for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder in patients undergoing radical cystectomy”.
When we say ‘patients and the public’, we mean patients and potential patients, carers, people who use health and social care services, and people or organizations that represent these groups.
We are interested in whether the language of the review, especially the language used in the Plain Language Summary (PLS), is accessible and feels relevant for those experiencing bladder cancer, so it will be helpful to patients and members of the public making healthcare decisions.
We welcome feedback on any aspect of the review, with particular focus on the PLS section. Our aim is for this to be a manageable task and not overburden our reviewers.
If you are interested in providing peer review, please include your e-mail address in your response. This will allow us to confirm your enrolment in our editorial management system (called Editorial Manager) and ensure that you can receive the review assignment.
Thank you in advance for your consideration!
Ideal applicant
Questions & comments
Cochrane