Have you or someone you know experienced or been affected by amblyopia (lazy eye)? Your input is needed on a review considering binocular versus standard occlusion or blurring treatment for children with unilateral amblyopia.
Skills / interests: Patient and public input
Would you be interested in helping us with this research article focused on binocular versus standard occlusion or blurring treatment for children with unilateral amblyopia? I am looking for a patient or member of the public who would be willing to peer review this Cochrane systematic review “Binocular versus standard occlusion or blurring treatment for unilateral amblyopia in children aged three to eight years”.
When we say ‘patients and the public’, we mean patients and potential patients, carers, people who use health and social care services, and people or organizations that represent these groups. We are interested in whether the language of the review, especially the language used in the Plain Language Summary (PLS), is accessible and if it feels relevant for those experiencing amblyopia, so it will be helpful to patients and members of the public making healthcare decisions.
We welcome feedback on any aspect of the review, noting particular focus and feedback for the PLS section. Our aim is for this to be a manageable task and not to overburden our reviewers.
If you are interested in providing peer review, please include your e-mail address in your response. This will allow us to confirm your enrolment in our editorial management system (called Editorial Manager) and ensure that you can receive the review assignment.
Thank you in advance for your consideration!
Ideal applicant
Questions & comments
Cochrane