Do you have an interest in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA)? Your input is needed!
Skills / interests: Patient and public input
Would you be interested in helping us provide patient/public feedback with this research article focused on PET-CT for assessing mediastinal lymph node involvement in patients with suspected resectable non-small cell lung cancer?
When we say ‘patients and the public’, we mean patients and potential patients, carers, people who use health and social care services, and people or organizations that represent these groups.
Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) summarize the evidence about test accuracy. Ideally, they also investigate why the results may vary among studies, compare the performance of alternative tests, and help the reader to put the evidence in a clinical context.
While you are welcome to provide feedback on any aspect of the review, you can focus your attention on the summary sections. Our aim is for this to be a manageable task, that does not overburden reviewers.
If you are interested in providing peer review, in your response please provide your e-mail address so that we can ensure you are enrolled in our Editorial Manager system and can receive the assignment officially. Thank you in advance for considering!
Ideal applicant
Questions & comments
Cochrane